My Photo

Veil of Lies

Poll

  • What is your favorite medieval mystery character?
    Dame Frevisse
    Brother Cadfael
    Catherine LaVendeur
    Owen Archer
    Crispin Guest
      
    Free polls from Pollhost.com

Independent Mystery Booksellers

IndieBound.org

Amazon.com

Medieval-Novels.com

Another Big Bookstore Closes its Doors

Duttons2 This is truly an era passing away. Dutton's in Brentwood, CA (Los Angeles) that used to have two locations in swanky areas has to close its doors after twenty years. It's one of those places I dreamed of doing a signing in some day. Unfortunately, now I won't get that chance. They are closing up shop in April well before my book can hit the streets. Their Beverly Hills store closed in December over rent disputes and now the Brentwood store will close because the developer who owns the property is going to refurbish and rebuild the shops in that area. The new, smaller bookstore he is putting in at "ridiculously low rent" may be too small for Dutton's culture, says Doug Dutton. Duttons_2

Hey, I know LA is about change. I've seen it morph into all sorts of things over the years, from when I grew up there in the sixties to today. When I was a kid, I remember being in the car and cruising down the Harbor Freeway and gawking at the buildings of downtown. In those days, the City Hall was the tallest building. Now it is dwarfed by the other mega buildings surrounding it.

Book culture was always part of my younger days. We'd make the occasional trek downtown to the LA Public Library and even when I was a kid, I marveled at the deco design and WPA artwork in the place. Stairwells with brass and wood. Large wooden book index files (before computers made it easy to look up books and where in the library they could be found.)

Duttonbh_2When I was a teenager, we journeyed to Westwood by UCLA to go into their multi-floored bookstore. We perused the used bookstores in Long Beach--Acres of Books, and all the other stores we came to love. Recently, I've come to love Warwick's in La Jolla as the sort of standard independent bookstore; cozy, knowlegdable staff, a little of this, a little of that. Sure, we all buy books on Amazon, too. It's inevitable, the convenience. But it is no substitute for thumbing down the shelves, picking up something that looks interesting, and making that discovery.

Are bookstores a dying breed? I hope not. Like books themselves--paper and cardboard cover--I hope they never disappear. We need them. We need the visceral sense of walking into a place that smells like books, of taking a book down from a shelf and paging through it with our flesh and blood hands, not virtual fingers, of chatting with staff that actually reads and can recommend. Call me a dinosaur, but I don't want these experiences to die off. Yeah, there's room for Amazon and e-books and e-book readers, but please give me the brick and mortar stores, too. Can't we all just get along?   

    

Getting Serious

Helmbasel1

Got to get serious again about putting up real posts here. Sorry about the delay. The boy wizard is off my back, I've gotten considerable work done on the next Crispin, and it's time to do some mystery and history again.

Some upcoming posts: medieval forensics--what Crispin could or couldn't know; more stuff on weapons (I loves the weapons); a few things about Richard II's court; crime and punishment in the middle ages; important medieval battles; strange English customs and traditions... Those are just a few. Stay tuned.

A Book Deal!

Open_book2 

It happened yesterday. I was ditching a staff meeting at work by hanging out at home and monitoring my calls when my agent Steve Mancino called me yesterday morning. "We have an offer." Four of the nicest words in the English language. It can be revealed at last that St. Martin's Press has made a deal for VEIL OF LIES! Even though the erstwhile first book in the series CUP OF BLOOD was rejected by St. Martin's, the editor remembered the characters and "couldn't get them out of his head." I had only just put the finishing touches on a revision of VEIL (the second book, now the first), and sent it off to Steve at JABberwocky when the editor called him and asked about me. Pow! I was certainly floored by that. I mean, even though I knew that these characters were great and that readers will love them (some already do, like Cornelia Read, Kat Richardson, Margaret Frazer, to name a few) it's still great to have an editor behind it.

On top of that, it will be coming out in hardcover and released in the fall of 2008! I couldn't be more pleased. I really wanted to give this series a home at St. Martin's and now it's going to be happening.

And none of it would have happened without my fabulous Vicious Circle, my critique buddies of Ana Brazil, Bobbie Gosnell, and Laura James. And of course, a supurb agent who never lets me get away with anything.

So that's nineteen novels, fourteen years, and four agents later. Sheesh! That's what it takes to be an overnight success?

Blurb$

Press

One of my chief goals for spending the cash I didn't have to go to Bouchercon last October was to meet editors to send my ms to and to get some blurbs from name authors. So far, I've accomplished both goals. The ever amazing Cornelia Read gave me a splendid blurb as did the fun and funny Margaret Frazer. I don't think my agent Steve has sent it out yet but it should be good.

In the meantime, however, I came across this little gem. Bonnie Goldstein of slate.com informs us about vanity presses who will not only publish your deserved or undeserved work for cash, but for a little extra, you can get a good review, too.

BookSurge is the press in question and for an additional $399 you can receive a personally craftedreview written by "New York Times bestselling author, Ellen Tanner Marsh," who did indeed make it to the NYT trade-paperback bestseller list in '82 and '83. 

"Not surprisingly," says Goldstein, "many BookSurge titles boast enthusiastic reviews by Marsh. 'For anyone seeking a health program that really works ... a motivating and significant book,' Marsh gushed about The Beer Drinkers [sic] "Diet". "We are drawn into this seaboard existence, seeing the stars pronging the sails at night, the flying fish that land on deck, and even the birds that fly, unaware, into the mast," Marsh cooed over The Last Voyage of the Cosmic Muffin. Some of these paid-for raves turn up on Amazon. "This well-organized, fun and fact-crammed guide will make any parent a hero … exploring and enjoying all that Long Island has to offer," Marsh enthused about Be the Coolest Parent on Your Block: Your Guide to Long Island and the Internet For Families."

For the whole article, see this link.

The Da Vinci Code Movie

Homersimpsondavinci

Well, I finally saw it. The Da Vinci Code movie. Those of you who have been with this blog for a while will know my problems with Dan Brown’s book. Now normally you will not see me dis a book here, because, normally, I am looking out for myself and you don’t want to be caught ripping apart other peoples’ books. But, seeing that it’s Dan Brown and he’s now richer than God, I think I’m allowed a little slack.

To recap the issue: My first novel in my Medieval Noir series featured Templars and the Holy Grail. Now I had the decency in my Afterword to acknowledge this fictional connection and to point out the instances in literature when these tenuous connections began. I explained, in other words, what was fictional and what was not. But I had the misfortune to try to peddle this book when The Da Vinci Code hit the streets. Editor after editor rejected it, mostly on the grounds that they didn’t want a Da Vinci Code redo even though my plot had nothing in relation with the Da Vinci Code. I was burned. Fortunately, once I’ve finished one book I simply start working on the next, so I already had book two when my agent and I made the sad decision to shelve book one and move book two into the number one slot. Hence, Veil of Lies as the first Crispin Guest novel.

Okay. Now you’re up to speed on that. I read the book and found it...er...flawed. Not for religious reasons. That’s another issue. But simply for its faulty research and Dan Brown’s insistence that his research was great and his sources impeccable. Feh! When you are into history you take umbrage when someone plays fast and loose with it and then doesn’t have the cajones to own up to it. Well, it sold millions. He’d done something right. Whether it was the two page chapters so you didn’t notice all the character flaws, or the unrealistic chase, who knows? I was going to see the movie eventually, just not when it was in the theatres. No more money for Dan Brown’s pocket. But I saw it last night with my husband who had not read the book.

We were of the same opinion.

The movie seemed to point out all the flaws of the book in Cinerama and Technicolor. Flaws of plot, of characterizations, of character motivations, of simple police procedure...and history, of course. You can’t fault Tom Hanks for phoning in his performance because he was being true to the book, where his character was as cardboard as a George W. Bush presidency. From its strained urgency in the beginning to its exposition intermission of bad art history and bad medieval history in the middle, we were sent on a kiddy rollercoaster ride of absurd twists and turns with Clouseu-like cops who didn’t even bother to search a car trunk for some fugitives, to incoherent little blips of scenes with cardinals whom we don’t get where they came from, to the uninteresting heroine who should have been more educated than she appeared. Oh that's right. They needed more exposition, so she had to be stupid enough for people to explain it to her. Omniscient, she’s not. Guess she didn’t inherit from the smart side of the family.

Did I like anything about the movie? Yes. I liked the little “ghosts” that Ron Howard put in, the historical flashbacks. That was about it. And I liked the fact that it was a Netflix rental and cost me about 50 cents to rent. Forget Robert Langdon, people. Stick to Crispin Guest. At least he gets his history right.

Rejection

Rejection

Ah, rejection. It is the bane of the writer. Rejection can either build you up with the fierce desire to "show them!" or it can destroy with its simple prose of finality. "We don't have suitable space..." "It's just not right for our list..." "We decided not to pursue your project..." blah blah blah. I guess one of my "favorite" rejections was the return of my query letter with a rubber stamp slapped on the upper right hand corner that read "Not Interested." They were so anxious to return it to me they didn't even seal the envelope!

Well, I've been thrown outta better joints than that! Anyway, what I did was send a Crispin short story to Ellery Queen Mystery Magazine, one of the absolute few who publish mystery fiction, and it was rejected. I've actually had some success with short stories. My first was published in a defunct literary magazine called Kinesis many years ago. And I have since published two so far in St. Anthony Messenger Magazine, and received an unexpected award for one of them. So though I've sold many magazine and newspaper articles, there is nothing like selling one's fiction someplace. 

I will send it to The Strand next and I suppose if they reject it, I can put it up on Amazon Shorts--short stories by authors that Amazon sells electronically for 49 cents. Not ideal but something. It's a very tight market for short stories. Magazines that used to carry them (usually women's magazines) no longer do, or won't take untried authors. It's very hard indeed to make a living at writing fiction. Almost any other industry will pay you more. It's truly a shame to watch celebrities receive a mint of an advance with a no-talent work and watch great midlist authors struggling. But it's not about fair, is it? It's about good old- fashioned capitalism.

If you'd like to read two short stories, just pop in on my web site and click on "The Tin Box" and "Catching Elijah". 

More Medieval Fallacies

Middle20ages

Here we continue our discussion on this amazingly erroneous 1999 email titled “Life in the 1500s” from people who don’t know from research.

Houses had thatched roofs-thick straw-piled high, with no wood underneath. It was the only place for animals to g et warm, so all the cats and other small animals (mice, bugs) lived in the roof When it rained it became slippery and sometimes the animals would slip and fall off the roof. Hence the saying . It's raining cats and dogs. There was nothing to stop things from falling into the house.. This posed a real problem in the bedroom where bugs and other droppings could mess up your nice clean bed. Hence, a bed with big posts and a sheet hung over the top afforded some protection. That's how canopy beds came into existence.

Obviously, this person has not made a study of thatching. The thatchers art is remarkable. Long straw as well as Norfolk reeds are bundled together very tightly, tied to the roof framework, and sparred to each other with hazel spars (resembling giant bobby pins) before it is cut and trimmed to just the right contour for the roof. It becomes a very tight seal indeed, providing excellent insulation to keep warmth in during the winter and out during the summer. Nothing—not rain or snow—is going to get through it. Houses are still thatched in this same method today in England and other parts of Europe, and it is very expensive in modern times because the art is all but lost except for a few hard-working artisans. The idiom “raining like cats and dogs” comes in around the 17th century “raining dogs and polecats”, and later by Jonathan Swift of Gulliver’s Travels fame, who writes, "I know Sir John will go, though he was sure it would rain cats and dogs". So once again, the mysterious emailer has the wrong information and the wrong century.

Canopies and bed curtains. Well, in Northern Europe, it can get mighty cold at night. For a little warmth and to avoid drafts (also for some privacy if your servants slept in the same room with you) you had curtains and overhead coverings. Mystery solved. But they go on:

The floor was dirt. Only the wealthy had something other than dirt. Hence the saying, Dirt poor. The wealthy had slate floors that would get slippery in the winter when wet, so they spread thresh (straw) on floor to help keep their footing. As the winter wore on, they added more thresh until, when you opened the door, it would all start slipping outside. A piece of wood was placed in the entranceway. Hence the saying a thresh hold. (Getting quite an education, aren't you?)

Quite. The expression “dirt poor” comes from around 1937 and most likely refers to Depression era dirt farmers of the Dustbowl.

Thresh on the stone or more often wood floor kept the dirt and dust down before carpets came into play. To the thresh was sometimes added strew, herbs and flowers like lavender and rosemary to sweeten the air. The threshold or the piece of wood lying across one’s doorway may have been the older meaning of “tread” rather than keeping the thresh inside.

In those old days, they cooked in the kitchen with a big kettle that always hung over the fire. Every day they lit the fire and added things to the pot. They ate mostly vegetables and did not get much meat. They would eat the stew for dinner, leaving leftovers in the pot to get cold overnight and then start over the next day. Sometimes stew had food in it that had been there for quite a while. Hence the rhyme, Peas porridge hot, peas porridge cold, peas porridge in the pot nine days old.

1762. That’s when the Oxford Dictionary of Nursery Rhymes says this rhyme shows up.

Sometimes they could obtain pork, which made them feel quite special. When visitors came over, they would hang up their bacon to show off. It was a sign of wealth that a man could, bring home the bacon. They would cut off a little to share with guests and would all sit around and chew the fat.

Let’s see. Speculation on this one ranges from the American Civil War (oh those goober peas!) to Cockney Rhyming Slang: “Chew the fat”-- "have a chat". You won’t find this sort of rhyming slang any earlier than around WWI.

Those with money had plates made of pewter. Food with high acid content caused some of the lead to leach onto the food, causing lead poisoning death. This happened most often with tomatoes, so for the next 400 years or so, tomatoes were considered poisonous. Bread was divided according to status. Workers got the burnt bottom of the loaf, the family got the middle, and guests got the top, or the upper crust. Lead cups were used to drink ale or whisky. The combination would sometimes knock the imbibers out for a couple of days. Someone walking along the road would take them for dead and prepare them for burial. They were laid out on the kitchen table for a couple of days and the family would gather around and eat and drink and wait and see if they would wake up. Hence the custom of holding a wake.

Oy! Okay, pewter was something still relegated to the wealthy and not in wide use until about the 15th century. Wooden plates were more often used in common households. In very wealthy homes, silver plates. Plates made of precious metals were in fact used as currency. You’d keep your plate under lock and key. If you ever had to make a hasty departure, grabbing your plates was a convenient way to carry your wealth away with you.

More common fair for drinking cups were made of ceramic, horn, leather, and goblets or bowls of silver. It takes a lot to leach lead from pewter. And lead poisoning doesn’t knock you out. The symptoms of lead poisoning may include: irritability, aggressive behavior, low appetite and energy, difficulty sleeping, headaches, reduced sensations, loss of previous developmental skills (in young children), anemia, constipation, abdominal pain and cramping (usually the first sign of a high, toxic dose of lead poison). Very high levels (meaning you’d have to be eating the stuff in large quantities) may cause vomiting, staggering gait, muscle weakness, seizures, or coma.

Bread. Honestly. Trencher loaves were cooked specifically for their use as plates for food. After it soaked up the juices you could eat it, but more often than not, your servants ate it or it was donated to almshouses to pass out to the poor. Why would you want to eat just the crust? If you were rich, in fact, you prided yourself on being able to afford well-milled wheat for light, fluffy loaves of bread. The poorer folk actually ate healthier bread, made with husks and oats and other dark products (that we pay more for today in the supermarket. Ain’t that a kick in the head?) "Kutt the vpper crust [of the loaf] for youre souerayne" from the 15th century merely means "serve him first".

The “wake” derives from the term “watch” as in vigil. One would pray all night over the corpse, or watch them. The practice of this being a time for consuming food or drink and visiting with others during the watching time or wake, came as people traveled over long distances to stay for the funeral.

England is old and small and the local folks started running out of places to bury people. So they would dig up coffins and would take the bones to a bone-house, and reuse the grave. When reopening these coffins, 1 out of 25 coffins were found to have scratch marks on the inside and they realized they had been burying people alive. So they would tie a string on the wrist of the corpse, lead it through the coffin and up through the ground and tie it to a bell. Someone would have to sit out in the graveyard all night (the graveyard shift.) to listen for the bell; thus, someone could be, saved by the bell or w as considered a .dead ringer.. And that's the truth...Now, whoever said History was boring ! ! !

One out of twenty-five huh? A statistic with as much currency as the rest of this “information.” Pretty hard to bury people alive when the wake went on for days. After two days a body begins to decay. No mistaking that odor! They were really most sincerely dead. And “dead ringer”? That means an exact duplicate, doesn’t it? As in, “He’s a dead ringer for my uncle.” Does that mean he was sitting in the coffin making sure your uncle was dead? A “ringer” in this sense is a “horse substituted for another of similar appearance in order to defraud bookies.” It’s 19th century US horse-racing jargon. Add the adjective “dead” as in “dead sexy” and you’ve got “dead ringer.” See more about reuse of graves in this article from The Guardian.

And no, history isn’t boring. Especially the real history. Caveat: Don’t believe everything you read on the Web. And don't take strange emails from strangers.

Portrait of a Woman

Portrait_of_a_woman_by_robert_campin_cir I just wanted to put this portrait up again because it is so fascinating to me. As an artist, I strove to achieve realism in my work, though I wasn't a painter or illustrator. I simply wasn't trained for that. I became a graphic artist, but still, I always had an appreciation for realism, especially old masters. The picture above is "Portrait of a Woman" by Robert Campin circa 1420. This and other painters, like Holbein, Roger van der Weyden, Jan van Eyck and the like give us as close to photographs of a past era as we're going to get. It is truly a time machine. I used to spend literally hours staring at some of these masterpieces, looking at all the details: the shadows within the folds, how the fingers are placed, the eyes, the soft contours of the face. Not only has it achieved the perfection of the craft, but captured a moment now lost forever. These people lived and breathed and worked and loved. They were here. I don't know who this woman was in this portrait, but she is forever part of an expanding future because she sat for an artist. Did she realize her immortality as she sat, probably bored day after day? Who can know? 

Roger_van_der_weyden_portrait_of_a_lady_   

Here is Portrait of a Lady by Roger van der Weyden, 1460.

Jan_van_eyck_giovanni_arnolfini_and_his_ 

A crazily detailed portrait of Giovanni Arnolfini and his Bride by Jan van Eyck, 1434.

Catching Up to the Big Boys

Nytbr Last Sunday's New York Times Book Review (okay, it takes me a while to get to things) backpage essay by Marilyn Stasio--who usually writes the crime/mystery blotter for the Review--touted terroists and 9/11 tales taking up starring roles in new crime novels, even cozies. So it was with some fascination that I came across this tit bit: "...Other shifts in the genre have been more subtle: an uptick in historical detective fiction, a trendy turn to metaphysical religious themes and supernatural subject matter, and a wave of nostalgia-based plots."

Bingo! Right there with you, Marilyn. I've got an historical detective for you, with metaphysical religious thems and supernatural subject matter. It's my Medieval Noir series! We're takin' it to Bouchercon and we'll see who wants to get busy wid it! Ahem. I mean...which publisher would be interested in a lucrative partnership (getting a little too excited here.)   

Medieval Fallacies

Medwoman_little

Here’s something that really fries my grits. This email shows up from time to time. Don’t know where it came from and don’t know why it’s still out there because it is simply chock full of errors. In fact, if they wanted to get it completely wrong, they couldn’t have done it better.   

It starts like this:

LIFE IN THE 1500'S

   The next time you are washing your hands and complain because the water temperature isn't just how you like it, think about how things used to be. Here are some facts about the1500s:

   Most people got married in June because they took their yearly bath in May, and still smelled pretty good by June. However, they were starting to smell, so brides carried a bouquet of flowers to hide the body odor. Hence the custom today of carrying a bouquet when getting married.

Okay. Factoid number one here is WRONG! People in the middle ages and Renaissance (I count middle ages roughly between 500 and 1500 AD) washed themselves as often as they could. Do you think people’s sense of smell was different then? Stink is stink. We know where we stink the most and we wash that. True, tubs as such were only available to those who could afford such a thing and the servants to heat that much water. It is kind of cold to be standing in a small tub in England or Norway, but people did bathe this way. (Anybody who has ever been camping knows how to give themselves a quick wash). The city of Bath isn't called that for the heck of it. The Romans first discovered the hot springs there and made use of them. And so did the people centuries after in public bath houses. And there are always rivers and lakes.

And the reason for June weddings was mostly due to the Church calendar. One wasn't allowed to celebrate the sacraments of baptisms and marriages during Lent, so spring arrives and perhaps during the Lenten season couples weren’t being as penitential as they were supposed to be. Getting married as soon as Lent was over was sometimes a necessity—before the bride started to show! There were also the beginning blooms of flowers and this is a festive occasion after all. If it were true that the bride carried a bouquet to mask her own scent wouldn’t the groom being carrying one, too?    


    Baths consisted of a big tub filled with hot water. The man of the house had the privilege of the nice clean water, then all the other sons and men, then the women and finally the children. Last of all the babies. By then the water was so dirty you could actually lose someone in it. Hence the saying, Don't throw the baby out with the Bath water..

I believe there are still people alive today within living memory of this kind of bath. It was called the Saturday night bath, getting bathed before church the next morning. And yes, when you had to pump the water and then physically heat the water was a nuisance and a chore. The head of the house got the bath first and so on. But throwing the baby out? This is actually from a German proverb that dates to 1512. It was first recorded by Thomas Murner in his satire Narrenbeschwörung (Das Kind mit dem Bade ausschütten--"Pour the baby out with the bath") and it didn’t appear in English until Thomas Carlyle translated it and used it in an 1849 essay on slavery. It is believed that no babies were harmed in this idiom.

Stayed tuned for more.